|
||
|
23rd November 2013, 19:58 | #21 |
Banned
MG ZT+ V6 190 Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Spalding
Posts: 13,245
Thanks: 369
Thanked 1,196 Times in 818 Posts
|
As the X Type was made at Hailwood at the old Escort factory, it was hardly a paragon of quality!
|
23rd November 2013, 21:29 | #22 | |
Banned
MG ZT V6 190+ Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 33,223
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,614 Times in 1,416 Posts
|
Quote:
Owners of a 75 claim quality went downhill when production moved from Cowley to Longbridge. But I'm sure the fact is debatable In theory it was a budget Jaguar trying to compete in a class above what it was intended to be. In theory a bit like the 75 trying to compete in the same mid range saloon market which the German Marques have dominated. |
|
24th November 2013, 12:17 | #23 | |
Posted a thing or two
rover 75 CDTI Saloon Club SE Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 51
Thanked 40 Times in 27 Posts
|
Quote:
Nothing wrong with a 2.2 Mondeo diesel engine or a Ford 6 speed gearbox fitted in many X types they are quick and economical. I've got an X type estate 2007 which replaced a 2001 Mondeo estate which was a first class car. The Jaguar handles better and feels much tighter than the Mondeo although the Mondeo has the larger load space which sometimes is missed. Not as comfortable as my 75 CDTi 160 BHP which in reality is a toy but it does the job. As a point no one said too much when Rover fitted Honda parts to the 420. 416.etc , It wasn't slagged off because it was a sensible option in fact I'd rather a Honda petrol than the "K series" Our CDTi engines are BMW.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Last edited by philjudo; 24th November 2013 at 13:04.. |
|
|
|