Common*sense*prevails - Page 3

damienp · 15th January 2011, 13:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by VVC-Geeza

Why are the likes of Sutcliffe allowed to appeal having been found guilt beyond doubt of such horrendous crimes?

It isn't his first appeal either,no doubt costing the taxpayer an arm and a leg each time.

I'm afraid i'm with most of you above,he should no longer be walking this earth to be in a position to appeal.Perhaps it might be an idea to release him so he could face TRUE justice.

An eye for an eye doesn't seem to have worked in his case

VVC-Geeza · 15th January 2011, 13:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by damienp

An eye for an eye doesn't seem to have worked in his case

Blinding comment

FLYER · 15th January 2011, 14:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by damienp

An eye for an eye doesn't seem to have worked in his case

As his wieght has rocketed in his time inside it would appear we are feeding these people too much .

BIG LEK · 15th January 2011, 16:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by VVC-Geeza

Why are the likes of Sutcliffe allowed to appeal having been found guilt beyond doubt of such horrendous crimes?

It isn't his first appeal either,no doubt costing the taxpayer an arm and a leg each time.

I'm afraid i'm with most of you above,he should no longer be walking this earth to be in a position to appeal.Perhaps it might be an idea to release him so he could face TRUE justice.

Couldn't have put it better myself totally agree with you,

damienp · 15th January 2011, 20:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by VVC-Geeza

I'm afraid i'm with most of you above,he should no longer be walking this earth to be in a position to appeal.Perhaps it might be an idea to release him so he could face TRUE justice.

Like jamie bulger's killers you mean.

FLYER · 15th January 2011, 23:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by damienp

Like jamie bulger's killers you mean.

When I started this thread I think I lifted the lid on some simmering issues that affect us all .

Dragrad · 11th May 2011, 23:28

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital...United_Kingdom

an extract...

On 10 October 2003, effective from 1 February 2004, the UK acceded to the 13th Protocol, which prohibits the death penalty under all circumstances, so that the UK may no longer legislate to restore the death penalty while it is subject to the Convention. It can only now restore it if it withdraws from the Council of Europe.

End of...... Unless we declare UDI

FLYER · 11th May 2011, 23:34

holy thread resurrection batman .

Ros3 · 11th May 2011, 23:36

Here's where i stand. If it can be proved beyond any doubt that one person willfully murdered another then they should be hung no question. And i am sure that the same could be applied to other crime's. It would act as a deterent would lesson prison numbers and would save the tax payer millions..

Dragrad · 11th May 2011, 23:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by FLYER

holy thread resurrection batman .

Oh well, these thing happen

Even Mods are human...

11th May 2011, 23:28	#27
Dragrad This is my second home *None DROWNED** Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Cardigan Posts: 33,339 Thanks: 1,257 Thanked 1,664 Times in 1,081 Posts	Death Penalty - The final nail.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital...United_Kingdom an extract... On 10 October 2003, effective from 1 February 2004, the UK acceded to the 13th Protocol, which prohibits the death penalty under all circumstances, so that the UK may no longer legislate to restore the death penalty while it is subject to the Convention. It can only now restore it if it withdraws from the Council of Europe. End of...... Unless we declare UDI __________________ Andrew Ich Dien Problem solving is... lateral thinking SEARCH FIRST ...ASK LATER...

11th May 2011, 23:34	#28
FLYER Banned rover75 cdti AUTO TOURER 160 bhp. Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Glasgow Posts: 35,346 Thanks: 2,985 Thanked 3,685 Times in 2,463 Posts	holy thread resurrection batman .

11th May 2011, 23:36	#29
Ros3 This is my second home Rover 75 V6 saloon (gone to the Rover garage in the sky), Mazda mx5 Phoenix. Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Cumnock Posts: 3,215 Thanks: 347 Thanked 157 Times in 92 Posts	Here's where i stand. If it can be proved beyond any doubt that one person willfully murdered another then they should be hung no question. And i am sure that the same could be applied to other crime's. It would act as a deterent would lesson prison numbers and would save the tax payer millions..