Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club General Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28th December 2012, 14:05   #11
Robson Rover Repair
NI/ROI RS
 
Robson Rover Repair's Avatar
 
ZT-T 190 / 75 Diesel x3 / 6 door limo / 216 Cabby / Rover 25 van

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Antrim
Posts: 8,103
Thanks: 299
Thanked 1,046 Times in 568 Posts
Default

My buyers guide covers it all.

BTW, you can change a 160 to the 177 tune which was restricted by MG Rover, and then if you want, remap it again.

Its just the same as remaping a standard Rover 75 2.5 V6, would take you from 177bhp to around another 12bhp or so more.

If its worth it finicially would be another matter as the back box on the OEM 160 v6 exhaust is much more restrictive than the OEM 180 Rover 75 or 180 MG ZT box.

But an extra 30bhp isnt to be sniffed at!
Robson Rover Repair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th December 2012, 18:07   #12
Canonite
This is my second home
 
BMW 330d Tourer, MG ZT 180 SE XPG, VW Polo 6R 1.2 TDI Bluemotion

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: York
Posts: 6,022
Thanks: 363
Thanked 574 Times in 319 Posts
Default

If it helps confuse matters further, my 160 has the 177 upgrade and I have a full stainless steel cat-back and it's running 183bhp. But it's worth factoring in the added cost to your insurance premium for having these mods over a standard 190.
Canonite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 11:11   #13
egremont
Loves to post
 
egremont's Avatar
 
Rover 75 Connoisseur SE. Auto. Saloon. SE

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 458
Thanks: 163
Thanked 198 Times in 70 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin_NI View Post
My buyers guide covers it all.

BTW, you can change a 160 to the 177 tune which was restricted by MG Rover, and then if you want, remap it again.

Its just the same as remaping a standard Rover 75 2.5 V6, would take you from 177bhp to around another 12bhp or so more.

If its worth it finicially would be another matter as the back box on the OEM 160 v6 exhaust is much more restrictive than the OEM 180 Rover 75 or 180 MG ZT box.

But an extra 30bhp isnt to be sniffed at!
Thanks Colin, for this information.

I assume you have to change the camshafts to get the extra power. Does the ECU also need altering - by Testbook?

Rimmer Bros list camshaft for 160 PS; 177 PS -noting “except MG ZT & ZT-T”; and 190 PS – noting “MG ZT & ZT-T. Seems the 177 PS is only intended for the Rover 2.5 whilst the 190 PS is only compatible with the ZT.

Will the different camshaft profiles fit the one common cylinder head? Must be a reason why the 177 is for Rover and the 190 is specifically for the ZT. or are there design differences in adition to the camshafts?

Does an “upgrade” require a reconfiguration of the car’s ECU? I note that Rimmer Bros mention in their parts listing that the “ECU is programmable to vehicle testbook or once configured to a vehicle this cannot subsequently be reconfigured”.
egremont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 11:46   #14
Johnocyprus
Regular poster
 
Johnocyprus's Avatar
 
Rover 75 Con SE HL MGB GT

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Esher
Posts: 79
Thanks: 58
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Thumbs up Zt v6 160+

Check out Tom-gt86's ZT for sale on Rover.org. It's a seriously beautiful car at a giveaway price and the belts have recently been done. I very seriously considered having a look at this but have two MG's already and it would mean selling one of my MGs and I love my BGT and my F too much. I trawled through his many posts and the guy seems genuine. Good luck.
Johnocyprus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 12:36   #15
Robson Rover Repair
NI/ROI RS
 
Robson Rover Repair's Avatar
 
ZT-T 190 / 75 Diesel x3 / 6 door limo / 216 Cabby / Rover 25 van

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Antrim
Posts: 8,103
Thanks: 299
Thanked 1,046 Times in 568 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by egremont View Post
Thanks Colin, for this information.

I assume you have to change the camshafts to get the extra power. Does the ECU also need altering - by Testbook?

Rimmer Bros list camshaft for 160 PS; 177 PS -noting “except MG ZT & ZT-T”; and 190 PS – noting “MG ZT & ZT-T. Seems the 177 PS is only intended for the Rover 2.5 whilst the 190 PS is only compatible with the ZT.

Will the different camshaft profiles fit the one common cylinder head? Must be a reason why the 177 is for Rover and the 190 is specifically for the ZT. or are there design differences in adition to the camshafts?

Does an “upgrade” require a reconfiguration of the car’s ECU? I note that Rimmer Bros mention in their parts listing that the “ECU is programmable to vehicle testbook or once configured to a vehicle this cannot subsequently be reconfigured”.
To take a 160 to 177 only requires a ecu recode with a t4 as they are identical components wise. A 160 is just a reduced power 177. Nothing else. Done for tax and range purposes with the zt range. Plenty of t4 owners on here can do it for you.

The 190 cars are identical to the 177 engines bar the cam component essentially. Slightly different timing and a different 5th gear compared to the zt 160 v6. Air box, air box ducting, cam / timing, 60mm internal exhaust from cat back (over 57mm on the rover 2.5) and a unique back box with baffles that allow for more noise above 3500rpm.
Robson Rover Repair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 19:19   #16
egremont
Loves to post
 
egremont's Avatar
 
Rover 75 Connoisseur SE. Auto. Saloon. SE

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 458
Thanks: 163
Thanked 198 Times in 70 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin_NI View Post
To take a 160 to 177 only requires a ecu recode with a t4 as they are identical components wise. A 160 is just a reduced power 177. Nothing else. Done for tax and range purposes with the zt range. Plenty of t4 owners on here can do it for you.

The 190 cars are identical to the 177 engines bar the cam component essentially. Slightly different timing and a different 5th gear compared to the zt 160 v6. Air box, air box ducting, cam / timing, 60mm internal exhaust from cat back (over 57mm on the rover 2.5) and a unique back box with baffles that allow for more noise above 3500rpm.
Thanks again Colin.
It is always a pleasure to read your comments.
egremont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 20:54   #17
coab
This is my second home
 
coab's Avatar
 
2007 57 GOLF GTi EDITION 30 DSG

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Newport Shropshire and Coventry.
Posts: 5,138
Thanks: 2,424
Thanked 1,452 Times in 852 Posts
Default

"
To take a 160 to 177 only requires a ecu recode with a t4 as they are identical components wise. A 160 is just a reduced power 177. Nothing else. Done for tax and range purposes with the zt range. Plenty of t4 owners on here can do it for you.

The 190 cars are identical to the 177 engines bar the cam component essentially. Slightly different timing and a different 5th gear compared to the zt 160 v6. Air box, air box ducting, cam / timing, 60mm internal exhaust from cat back (over 57mm on the rover 2.5) and a unique back box with baffles that allow for more noise above 3500rpm."


So apart from that they are the same? What about the brakes? :xmas-smiley-005:
coab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 22:00   #18
Robson Rover Repair
NI/ROI RS
 
Robson Rover Repair's Avatar
 
ZT-T 190 / 75 Diesel x3 / 6 door limo / 216 Cabby / Rover 25 van

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Antrim
Posts: 8,103
Thanks: 299
Thanked 1,046 Times in 568 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coab View Post
"
To take a 160 to 177 only requires a ecu recode with a t4 as they are identical components wise. A 160 is just a reduced power 177. Nothing else. Done for tax and range purposes with the zt range. Plenty of t4 owners on here can do it for you.

The 190 cars are identical to the 177 engines bar the cam component essentially. Slightly different timing and a different 5th gear compared to the zt 160 v6. Air box, air box ducting, cam / timing, 60mm internal exhaust from cat back (over 57mm on the rover 2.5) and a unique back box with baffles that allow for more noise above 3500rpm."


So apart from that they are the same? What about the brakes? :xmas-smiley-005:
Engine differences are whats discussed. 292 vs 325 mm fronts obviously and year dependant solid vs vented year discs.
Robson Rover Repair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 22:30   #19
rover54
Retired
 
rover 75 v6 Auto Conn. SE 54 plate LPG and 2006 Rover 75 v6 Auto LPG , 1.8 r75 Manual

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 3,379
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default

190's also have different gudgeon pins and big end bearings to withstand higher downward forces.
rover54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th December 2012, 06:57   #20
Le Mans 190
I really should get out more.......
 
RIP Le Mans 190 :(

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atherstone
Posts: 2,260
Thanks: 355
Thanked 248 Times in 177 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDoodles View Post
Plenty of nice cheap 190's with full history, if you are prepared to have a little patience! :xmas-smiley-031:

Totall agree
Le Mans 190 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd