|
||
|
5th August 2013, 19:08 | #71 |
This is my second home
MG ZT+ 135 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Exeter
Posts: 3,626
Thanks: 9
Thanked 42 Times in 26 Posts
|
I had the synergy for 30 months, so im well aware that its rougher, as is almost everyone who has switched.
The 160 remap is quieter and the power delivery is smoother and more consistent. It doesn't always feel as fast, because of the smoothness, but push the car and you will find yourself arriving into corners faster than you expected, if you are still expecting it to act like the synergy. Its a far better solution than the synergy. I sold mine for the cost of the 160 remap, so it was effectively free.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
5th August 2013, 19:18 | #72 | |
Posted a thing or two
Seafrost 75 Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,821
Thanks: 232
Thanked 142 Times in 113 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Godfer (Sid) A lovely Seafrost 1.8T |
|
6th August 2013, 02:44 | #73 |
Passed Away
2002 Pale Blue. Rover 75 CDTi Connoisseur auto. 170K miles Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near the M67.
Posts: 14,509
Thanks: 199
Thanked 585 Times in 397 Posts
|
I agree with Harry, my car has always been very very smooth to drive, both with Synergy only, and with Synergy and remap...
Personally I think you would be hard pressed to find a smoother car.. ... |
6th August 2013, 03:18 | #74 |
Gets stuck in
Rover 75 Saloon Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 937
Thanks: 576
Thanked 114 Times in 99 Posts
|
I like the delivery from my 2.5. Couldn't be happier. As far as testing it against a remap well...if I lost I could put it down to the extra weight of all the walnut I've added.
__________________
Love my 75 and it loves me Membership Number 1703 This vehicle was the 82,624th 75 to run off the production line, out of 112,381 This vehicle was the 6,161st 75 2.5 V6 Contemporary to be made out of 8,214 This vehicle was the 9,755th 75 in White Gold Metallic (code: GMN) to be made out of 12,251 White Gold Metallic 75s |
|
|