|
||
|
27th November 2011, 10:57 | #21 |
Avid contributor
Rover 75 Tourer Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Salford, Lancashire
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Love the MG6 (esp Magnette). Liked the MG5 concept photos. Finished product is vile. Utterly horrible.
MG need to be putting out sporty hatchbacks if they're not launching any two-seat sports cars. This is far, far from the likes of Astras sport-hatches, which I must admit are simply fantastic.
__________________
Steve Worsley Current fleet: 2012 MG 6 GT SE 1.8T 2003 Rover 75 Club SE 1.8T 1989 Rover Montego GSi Executive |
30th November 2011, 08:47 | #22 |
Regular poster
ROVER 75 TOURER CONNY SE CDTTI Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CAMBRIDGE
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Mg5
Not for me, one for the ZS fans maybe?
|
6th December 2011, 16:55 | #23 | |
Regular poster
MG ZT 2.0 CDTi mkI Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Liverpool / Coventry
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
The concept looked interesting, but execution on this is nasty. I used to own a ZS mkII saloon, and have had the ZT for a while and the missus has a ZR. Lovely looking cars. MG6 is a decent looking motor, and if there was a diesel option it would more than likely be on my driveway now. They need to get a range of engines out - diesel and petrol that are competitive in today's market which the lump they have in the MG6 just isn't. Small 1.3 3 cylinder eco's to 2.5 V6's. The new Ford EcoBoost engine 1.0 turbocharged 3 cylinder is economical and powerful (100+ bhp) IMO they shouldn't have bothered releasing the MG6 until they had a diesel AND petrol seeing people dont want to be going to the fuel pumps more than they have to!! I love MG, and want them to succeed, but they do need to pull their finger out.
__________________
P5TLY - MG ZT 2.0 CDTi mkI |
|
|
|