Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Social Forums > Photography Corner
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24th October 2018, 18:12   #1
Phil
This is my second home
 
Phil's Avatar
 
Rover 75 CDT Connoisseur SE

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 12,227
Thanks: 469
Thanked 523 Times in 241 Posts
Default A question about filters and my "new" lens...

Hi,
As some may know, I've been attempting photos of stars...
I decided the best thing to do would be to buy a wide angle lens. I saw a Sigma 10-20mm f4 lens for a good price and bought it.
I know its not especially fast, but I have to work to a budget.
It turned up and was immaculate. It had also been fitted with a filter of the brand "camlink."

Now I've noticed two things.

First up, the lens. When taking regular photos in daylight, I have to have a very low shutter speed, when compared with my other lenses. Is this normal with a wide angle lens?

Second question which is specific to the filter.
Last weekend I went out at night and the front of the lens misted up over the filter. This has never happened for me before. (I usually use Hoya or Gobe filters.)

So do cheap filters (camlink) tend to mist up easily? Do better quality filters have some anti fog coating??
__________________
Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2018, 06:23   #2
Kennyeth
This is my second home
 
No more Rover

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire.
Posts: 5,881
Thanks: 1,625
Thanked 1,308 Times in 998 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post
Hi,
As some may know, I've been attempting photos of stars...
I decided the best thing to do would be to buy a wide angle lens. I saw a Sigma 10-20mm f4 lens for a good price and bought it.
I know its not especially fast, but I have to work to a budget.
It turned up and was immaculate. It had also been fitted with a filter of the brand "camlink."

Now I've noticed two things.

First up, the lens. When taking regular photos in daylight, I have to have a very low shutter speed, when compared with my other lenses. Is this normal with a wide angle lens?

Second question which is specific to the filter.
Last weekend I went out at night and the front of the lens misted up over the filter. This has never happened for me before. (I usually use Hoya or Gobe filters.)

So do cheap filters (camlink) tend to mist up easily? Do better quality filters have some anti fog coating??

Hi, Jeff (coolcat) and Alan (clf) are the two I know of to ask.
I try to keep to Hoya filters, a bit more expensive but has very good reputation.
Ken.
Kennyeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2018, 06:38   #3
Phil
This is my second home
 
Phil's Avatar
 
Rover 75 CDT Connoisseur SE

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 12,227
Thanks: 469
Thanked 523 Times in 241 Posts
Default

Hi Ken,

Thank you, I too prefer Hoya, but still impressed with my Gobe ND filters.

I wouldn't have bought the camlink myself, but it was already fitted.
__________________
Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2018, 07:33   #4
Avulon
This is my second home
 
1.8t Tourer

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tanelorn
Posts: 4,830
Thanks: 956
Thanked 1,148 Times in 916 Posts
Default

Take the filter off ... and bin it. what type of filter is it anyway? if it's affecting daylight exposures by more than 1 stop there's something wrong unless it is an ND Being supplied with the lens I'd guess it would be a UV filter? A wide angle lens in daylight I'd expect to let in more light (than a longer lens) and so need less exposure - not more. Taking star shots It's not going to make any real difference to exposure - just capture more stars, making the starfield in shot look denser than with a zoomed in lens. Are you using a tracking mount? Found a great youtube vid here includes a diy tracker - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg3a0I0duMI
__________________
Need a T4 ?: T4 Owners Map thanks to Stevestrat ( use at your own risk)

Where?:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanelorn
Mods/Retrofits:

PCV vortex 'filter'; bluetooth; inline thermostat; reversing sensors; plenum spyhole ; headlamp washers ; Diy mp3 player replacing CD multichanger; FBH with remote; Headlamp washers; black/chrome front grille, rear blind; Xenon projectors
To do:
puddle lights; 2 Din cd/nav to fit; boot release button
Avulon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2018, 08:04   #5
planenut
Regional Secretary
 
planenut's Avatar
 
Rover 1.8T Tourer

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 6,954
Thanks: 1,551
Thanked 2,036 Times in 1,264 Posts
Default

If the ambient temperature is low then one is advised to expose the camera and lens and give it time to cool and adapt before use; that should reduce the misting.
planenut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2018, 00:47   #6
Phil
This is my second home
 
Phil's Avatar
 
Rover 75 CDT Connoisseur SE

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 12,227
Thanks: 469
Thanked 523 Times in 241 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avulon View Post
Take the filter off ... and bin it. what type of filter is it anyway? if it's affecting daylight exposures by more than 1 stop there's something wrong unless it is an ND Being supplied with the lens I'd guess it would be a UV filter? A wide angle lens in daylight I'd expect to let in more light (than a longer lens) and so need less exposure - not more. Taking star shots It's not going to make any real difference to exposure - just capture more stars, making the starfield in shot look denser than with a zoomed in lens. Are you using a tracking mount? Found a great youtube vid here includes a diy tracker - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg3a0I0duMI
Hi,
I'd already decided to replace the filter with a Hoya, which I ordered yesterday.
I didn't see any plus point regarding the filter when I bought the lens, other than this cheap filter had been fitted from new and had therefore probably protected the lens.
I have been quite unimpressed with the lens for day light shots and had kind of assumed it was down to the cheap filter.

For star photography I am quite pleased with the lens, just wish I didn't have to use such high ISO, which results in so much post processing...
I'm not using a tracking mount. I'm purely a novice and stare at the sky until I can see things!
I tend to use 3200 ISO and a 20 second exposure.

These are the two most recent results using my "new" lens, both taken with full moon which isn't ideal..

I will definitely check out the video you linked to tomorrow, but now I have to go to bed!
Stars over the Brecon beacons. Wales, UK. by Philip Davies, on Flickr
Stars over Ravensroost wood, WIltshire, England. by Philip Davies, on Flickr
Quote:
Originally Posted by planenut View Post
If the ambient temperature is low then one is advised to expose the camera and lens and give it time to cool and adapt before use; that should reduce the misting.
Hi, I understand that, I was out with my fiance and her camera was completely unaffected, only mine misted up. It wasn't cold out either.
I assumed that the cheap filter that came with the second hand lens was to blame. I wondered if the cheap filters weren't anti fog coated... (I have no idea if any filter has anti fog coating!)
__________________
Phil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:28.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd