|
||
|
1st September 2013, 11:23 | #1 |
I really should get out more.......
MG ZT+ 160 v6 Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bridgwater
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 73
Thanked 233 Times in 210 Posts
|
speed limit devices
The EU are trying to bring in a law to force us into installing speed limiting devices on our cars, the UK are opposed (yay!)
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-limit-devices if it does happen it'll be the end of fun driving as we know it and is just one step closer to fully automated driving also could be more dangerous as one person put it, "It could take away people's ability to get themselves out of trouble with a quick burst of speed, such as in overtaking situations where the capacity to accelerate can avoid a head-on collision." thoughts? |
1st September 2013, 11:34 | #2 |
This is my second home
Jaguar XF 3.0D Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Southampton
Posts: 4,364
Thanks: 119
Thanked 509 Times in 426 Posts
|
But it also says the fitting of an audible warning would be acceptable, and the 75 already has this feature (visual and audible) albeit operating on one speed limit only with a choice of which limit you decide to use.
__________________
Chips |
1st September 2013, 11:37 | #3 |
This is my second home
MG ZT+ 135 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Exeter
Posts: 3,626
Thanks: 9
Thanked 42 Times in 26 Posts
|
Im surprised its taken this long. Its pretty hard to argue against them from a safety, legal and 'green' point of view.
However the resistance from our government has nothing to do with personal freedom, its about the huge loss of speeding fine revenue.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
1st September 2013, 11:41 | #4 |
I really should get out more.......
MG ZT+ 160 v6 Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bridgwater
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 73
Thanked 233 Times in 210 Posts
|
|
1st September 2013, 11:45 | #5 |
This is my second home
MG ZT+ 135 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Exeter
Posts: 3,626
Thanks: 9
Thanked 42 Times in 26 Posts
|
Maybe, but that seems like an excuse. I suspect it would cost less lives than it would save, by quite a margin. Its a weak argument when you have very very slow cars on the road already which couldn't get themselves out of trouble if they tried.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
1st September 2013, 11:52 | #6 |
This is my second home
MG ZT+ 135 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Exeter
Posts: 3,626
Thanks: 9
Thanked 42 Times in 26 Posts
|
1
I do think it would increase used car values though. I cant see them forcing older cars to have the technology fitted, so those wanting an unrestricted car would pay more for an older one.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Last edited by rovexCDTi; 1st September 2013 at 11:55.. |
1st September 2013, 12:05 | #7 |
Passed Away
MG ZT-T 160 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chester
Posts: 1,307
Thanks: 64
Thanked 222 Times in 145 Posts
|
even if it did come in they'll be overide devices available on ebay within days.
totally stupid idea and fortunately like mentioned the government would lose too much money from fines hence it won't happen |
1st September 2013, 12:08 | #8 |
This is my second home
Jaguar XF 3.0D Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Southampton
Posts: 4,364
Thanks: 119
Thanked 509 Times in 426 Posts
|
One thought strikes me not mentioned as yet, it such a device was dangerous as has been suggested, why do commercials have them?
__________________
Chips |
1st September 2013, 12:20 | #9 |
Passed Away
MG ZT-T 160 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chester
Posts: 1,307
Thanks: 64
Thanked 222 Times in 145 Posts
|
this is the same in many ways as those young drivers curfew insurance where it was proven poor lad died because he was trying to get home before his 11pm insurance curfew.
Coronoer pretty much put the blame on that being root cause. Speed awareness alerts are quite sufficient, locking the attributes of a car are just asking for problems maybe not to be increased but certainly shifted. |
1st September 2013, 13:25 | #10 |
I really should get out more.......
MG ZT+ 160 v6 Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bridgwater
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 73
Thanked 233 Times in 210 Posts
|
In the article it says older cars would be required to fit them, as for the slower cars, they'd be precisely the reason not to be stuck at the speed limit, countless times I have come across someone doing 10mph below the speed limit and the only way I could safely overtake would be to break the speed limit
|
|
|