|
||
|
7th December 2013, 16:49 | #1 |
Regular poster
Rover 75 tourer CDTi Auto Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Totnes
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Rover 75 cdti crankshaft damper pulley
Hi,
Why do they have a CRANKSHAFT DAMPER PULLEY why not a normal pulley ? |
7th December 2013, 16:52 | #2 |
Regular poster
Rover 75 tourer CDTi Auto Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Totnes
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Crankshaft damper pulley
Hi,
Why do they have a CRANKSHAFT DAMPER PULLEY why not a normal pulley ? as it only drives a BELT which is a DAMPER in its self ?. |
7th December 2013, 18:03 | #3 |
Avid contributor
75 saloon Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Prescot
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
7th December 2013, 18:04 | #4 |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 Conn CDT SE + intelligence pack Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Enniskillen
Posts: 1,094
Thanks: 6
Thanked 141 Times in 128 Posts
|
it damps out resonance in the crankshaft at certain revs which could otherwise cause damage/failure of the crank.
Rover could have re-engineered the crank to be more robust, but instead went the damper route. It is not simply a pulley to drive a belt on our cars. |
7th December 2013, 20:26 | #5 |
Regular poster
Rover75 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Southampton
Posts: 96
Thanks: 6
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
|
I think the pulley is not a 'damper' as such but a de-tuner. By separating the two parts of the pulley with rubber, the rotating crankshaft feels a continually varying mass on its end. as opposed to a constant mass as with a solid pulley. This variation in mass gives the crankshaft/pulley system a continuously changing critical or natural frequency of torsional vibration. Thus, if the engine is running at a speed where this natural or resonance frequency occurs, excessive torsional stresses are avoided which would otherwise occur if a solid pulley was fitted. So it is not a good idea to fix the two parts of the pulley together.
Just my understanding of the reason behind fitting a 'damper' pulley. Any other ideas? |
7th December 2013, 21:19 | #6 |
This is my second home
Rover75 and Mreg Corsa. Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumweer onat mote o'dust (Sagin)
Posts: 21,753
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,660 Times in 2,924 Posts
|
|
8th December 2013, 08:59 | #7 |
Regular poster
Rover75 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Southampton
Posts: 96
Thanks: 6
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
|
T-Cut,
Look for 'Torsional Vibration' in Wikepedia and you will find a description of the mechanics of these 'dampers'. In essence, its says that a crankshaft pulley containg an hydraulic element is a damper. Whereas one containg an elastic element, i.e. rubber, is a tuned mass 'damper' (also stating that the term damper in this application is not correct). This description is the essence of my understanding of the front pulley's function on the R75 diesel (other than driving the Aux. belt). Perhaps there is an engine designer in the club who can throw more light on subject. This does show that Wikepedia cannot be trusted entirely as it has contradicted itself here. Whatever, I think you would agree that the answer to Goodtimegaz is that the two parts of the pulley should not be locked together. Regards Jim Lee |
8th December 2013, 11:38 | #8 |
This is my second home
Rover75 and Mreg Corsa. Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumweer onat mote o'dust (Sagin)
Posts: 21,753
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,660 Times in 2,924 Posts
|
Yes I agree. They should be sold as tuned mass pulleys.
TC |
8th December 2013, 13:50 | #9 | |
Avid contributor
75 saloon Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Prescot
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
8th December 2013, 15:50 | #10 |
This is my second home
Rover75 and Mreg Corsa. Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumweer onat mote o'dust (Sagin)
Posts: 21,753
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,660 Times in 2,924 Posts
|
|
|
|