|
||
|
4th May 2014, 14:29 | #21 |
I really should get out more.......
MG ZT+ 160 v6 Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Bridgwater
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 73
Thanked 233 Times in 210 Posts
|
It makes a nice sporty note with the cat gone so would be good to silence the drone with a decat
|
4th May 2014, 18:25 | #22 | |
This is my second home
Previously owned- MG ZT V6 160 Y plate Lpg, MG ZT 190 2003 In Rare Celestial Factory Ordered Lpg MG Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calne
Posts: 4,531
Thanks: 8
Thanked 116 Times in 108 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Previously owned- MG ZT V6 160 Y plate Lpg, MG ZT 190 2003 In Rare Celestial Factory Ordered Lpg MG ZT 190 2004 lpg |
|
4th May 2014, 18:49 | #23 | |
Loves to post
mgzt Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Connahs Quay
Posts: 361
Thanks: 89
Thanked 102 Times in 74 Posts
|
Quote:
Performance exhausts are not purposely made to be noisy, its all about the flow, less boxes better flow Putting a smaller box in the system somewhere may reduce the noise / drone , but i am sure it will have some kind of negative performance effect Louder stereo may help lessen the noise |
|
5th May 2014, 10:39 | #24 |
Avid contributor
MG ZT+ 1.8T Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Grimsby
Posts: 152
Thanks: 17
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
|
Just thought i would chip my couple of bits in mate amongst all the de-cat bashing occurring lol
For one, my local performance exhaust fabricators told me that if my straight through system turns out too loud they would fit an intermediate muffler box for £60 all-in. That's not one they have made, they buy in mid-boxes ready made and still only charge 60 beans including cutting/welding/fitting. So i think 200 quid is extracting the urine to be honest! You could always try the old "rolled up fibreglass matting up your tailpipe" fix, this basically breaks up a lot of the sound coming from the end of the chimney so may dampen the whole thing down a bit! or you could always add a section of fibreglass inside the decat section somewhere, make up a baffle section within the existing pipe? i also see that your intermediate pipe is dead straight, the original on mine had two 45 degree bends in it to swerve it around the fuel tank before the big bend up to the backbox (Google a diagram on Rimmers or similar). Most aftermarket exhausts i scoped out didnt have these bends and just went over the fuel tank like yours, my exhaust guy is keeping them in on my straight through system as they will be critical in damping down the drone since i'm having no mid boxes! So for me the fix would be the 3 B's: baffles, bends, or failing those boxes. Also listed in price low>high lol As for the de-cat, if you can get away with it why the hell not not, i would if i could bud! You could always sports cat it if the day came when your mot tester failed it anyway, which would be a world better than the factory cat. The whole "put your cat back in" argument is a bit moot if a) you don't need it, b) you don't want it, and c) a sports cat would be better anyway!
__________________
Big Jim's Starlight Silver Mid-Life Crisis Modifying a car is like raising kids... it costs a fortune then inevitably lets you down...! |
5th May 2014, 12:17 | #25 | |
Posted a thing or two
MG ZT 190+ Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
Posts: 1,391
Thanks: 131
Thanked 99 Times in 92 Posts
|
Quote:
I'd recommend a bit big than half for yours because of the lack of cat. I've had 3 different back boxes 3 centre sections and 3 induction kits to get a good sound without loads of drone. |
|
5th May 2014, 14:38 | #26 | |
This is my second home
MG ZT260 SE, MG ZT190+, MG ZTT 160, R75 Conn SE 2.0, R75 Conn SE 2.5 X 3, R75 Club SE 1.8, P5B Coupe Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Keynsham, Bristol
Posts: 4,211
Thanks: 65
Thanked 635 Times in 499 Posts
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, a CAT is required for MOT & i'm sure it's only a matter of time before testers are allowed to remove undertrays for inspection ! The dreaded drone happened to me when I had a CAT-back Powerflow system fitted to my 2.0 KV6 Conn SE Auto. They were only going to fit one intermediate box back on but I insisted on two. The drone around 1800-2300rpm was dreadful so i took it back & they reduced the diameter of the pipe going into the back boxes (duplex system) Although it did improve it, a drone is still noticeable & after speaking to the Powerflow tech department, this is a common issue with SS systems. I also had a CAT-back duplex system fitted by Longlife on my ZT 190+ & asked them for their quietest system & noticed that they also fitted reduced bore rear pipes. There is even a slight drone with that too but nothing like the R75 but in fairness, the ZT is manual so you have a bit more control of the rev range. So, I would suggest, like others, refit the CAT & reduce the size of the pipe going to the rear silencer. |
|
5th May 2014, 22:40 | #27 |
This is my second home
Rover less ! Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Tarbolton
Posts: 3,442
Thanks: 393
Thanked 888 Times in 542 Posts
|
I stuffed loads of soft spongy material inside the boot liners and spare wheel well. I even fitted an extra layer under the boot carpet.
Car runs super quiet. |
17th August 2014, 18:58 | #28 |
Regular poster
Rover 75 Saloon Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: a/a
Posts: 70
Thanks: 18
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
Elaborating along the lines of reducing the flow area and creating interuptions to waves; I have an idea to fit a thick bolt (or perhaps several at various positions along the centre and/or rear runs of pipe. The bolt would be passing horizontally through across the diameter (so it doesn't weaken bending strength too much), size say about 12mm, creating a mild throttle effect. Holes each side could be sealed with a broad curved washer and some gun gum. Does that sound meaningful to you guys?
|
17th August 2014, 22:30 | #29 |
Passed Away
ROVER 75 V6 2Ltr 2001 AUTO / EMERALD MOTORBILITY SCOOTER Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poole Quay
Posts: 3,180
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 570 Times in 311 Posts
|
I had an aftermarket back box fitted which 'Boomed' like mad
A friend said 'the problem is the tail pipes are to far under the car' I got two new 'longer tailpipes', problem solved Not a technical answer, but for me it worked. trimani (Alf) |
18th August 2014, 18:30 | #30 |
Regular poster
Rover 75 Saloon Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: a/a
Posts: 70
Thanks: 18
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
googling around some more led me to some muscle car forums which spoke of "Helmholtz resonators" othrewise known as J-pipes ...take a look at these, would be interested to try it out!
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=257781 and http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...69#post2252069 |
|
|