Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > V8 Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5th May 2017, 07:53   #1
Reebs
Owners Club Director
 
Reebs's Avatar
 
Rover 75 Conn SE V6 / MG ZT 260 SE V8 / MG ZT 180 SE V6

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southampton
Posts: 20,935
Thanks: 645
Thanked 6,851 Times in 2,537 Posts
Question V8 MPG On A Long Run

While driving up to Eden Camp last weekend in the V8 I switched on the torque app that's installed in my double din and was amazed to find that driving for 267 miles on the motorway at 70mph it reported an average fuel consumption of 30.1mpg

Does that sound feasible in a 260 under such driving conditions or is the app and OBD dongle a bit wonky? In my V6 cars the IPK usually reads 28 - 30mpg on motorways, so if so there isn't much in it

Of course stop/start driving around town is another matter in the V8......
Reebs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 08:21   #2
dbt01
Retired
 
dbt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 378
Thanks: 15
Thanked 106 Times in 85 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reebs View Post
While driving up to Eden Camp last weekend in the V8 I switched on the torque app that's installed in my double din and was amazed to find that driving for 267 miles on the motorway at 70mph it reported an average fuel consumption of 30.1mpg

Does that sound feasible in a 260 under such driving conditions or is the app and OBD dongle a bit wonky? In my V6 cars the IPK usually reads 28 - 30mpg on motorways, so if so there isn't much in it

Of course stop/start driving around town is another matter in the V8......
I'm always a bit sceptical about the figures you get in that way. I know using the IPK 'estimates' is not at all accurate on any of my V6's. I would say that my V8 is only around 10% thirstier than the actual average (not IPK) for my V6's, but they vary by almost that amount from each other anyway.

The only way to tell is to check from top-up to top-up on the odometer, and then over a number of fill-ups and types of journey. On the 1000 mile round trips to PoL 2016 and 2017, same conditions and route, I got EXACTLY the same consumption approaching 29mpg. 90% motorway. Only one leg including 20 miles of 50mph road works cones on the M1 edged over the 30mpg this year (just cones and cameras; no 'work' of course) but I lost that advantage in the Belgian battle-zone!

Your figures look pretty much like mine I guess then. Personally I am surprised how frugal they are on fuel.

David

Last edited by dbt01; 5th May 2017 at 08:31..
dbt01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 08:29   #3
stevestrat
This is my second home
 
ZT260 #243 (resting)

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Prestonpans
Posts: 22,462
Thanks: 650
Thanked 4,624 Times in 3,358 Posts
Default

On a steady run with a gentle right foot (boring!) I get just over 28 mpg, that's using the old fashioned manual calculation fill up to fill up/mileage method. Like David I think that ain't bad considering the size of the lump under the bonnet. Never been brave enough to calculate the around town mileage.
__________________
Steve


T4 Location Map
stevestrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 08:39   #4
dbt01
Retired
 
dbt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 378
Thanks: 15
Thanked 106 Times in 85 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevestrat View Post
... Never been brave enough to calculate the around town mileage.
Me neither! Must be better than my old Jag V12 which I once measured at 3mpg over a week of school-runs in the depths of winter . That's Hummer level + !!

David
dbt01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 08:53   #5
FLYING BANANA
Moderator/Club Shop
 
FLYING BANANA's Avatar
 
MG ZT 1.8t+. No.3 of 4 in Sunspot Yellow & Ford Fiesta in Black.

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rattler Farm
Posts: 22,555
Thanks: 9,270
Thanked 15,645 Times in 6,806 Posts
Cool

On a good run I can get 26mpg out of the Bear. I have got it down to 12mpg after a spirited drive. I use the old method of calculating the mpg.
__________________


233,320. New rear tyres on order for BBB.

onen hag oll
FLYING BANANA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 09:04   #6
Leyland Worldmaster
This is my second home
 
Leyland Worldmaster's Avatar
 
Audi A2 1.4TDI

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Avec the Penguins!
Posts: 11,469
Thanks: 3,355
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,057 Posts
Talking

When I drive Alison enthusiastically, I get 50 MPG! Terrible! I'll have to calm things down so that I can return to our personal best which is 69 MPG.

🐧🐧🐧😁😁😁
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

🏓
Leyland Worldmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 09:06   #7
Simon227237
Newbie
 
MG ZT 260

Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 25
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I get an average of 28mpg out of mine on a mainly motorway runs. I have measured the mpg a few times on motorway runs using the brim to brim method and it always works out around 28mpg. I have never been brave enough to measure the mpg around town, I just put £20 in every time I use it.
Simon227237 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 09:17   #8
ceedy
This is my second home
 
ceedy's Avatar
 
All Trophy Blue ,ZT260#50 , ZT CDTI Auto, ZR105+ and 1.8T Firefrost spoiling the Set .

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nr Sherborne But in Somerset..
Posts: 6,075
Thanks: 916
Thanked 1,214 Times in 768 Posts
Default

Only to make Us 260'ers feel better ...


I can make my CDTi auto's IPK to show btween 7-11 mpg on a fast getaway from a standing start

C.
__________________
The Three Bloo's
Wifey's Zr105, MY CDTI & 260 #50 and
Number One sons 1.8T in Firefrost
When I were a lad
Zero to 142 in 10.25 secs at the Pod on my Blown Norton.
210 Kart Champ in 70's

ceedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 09:29   #9
dbt01
Retired
 
dbt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 378
Thanks: 15
Thanked 106 Times in 85 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedy View Post
Only to make Us 260'ers feel better ...


I can make my CDTi auto's IPK to show btween 7-11 mpg on a fast getaway from a standing start

C.
I can get a V6 IPK to show a " - " symbol instead. Minus sign means its using less than any fuel, right ? Teslar electric, go eat your heart out
... Maybe because it was a drag-start in reverse.

David

Last edited by dbt01; 5th May 2017 at 10:03..
dbt01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2017, 11:58   #10
stevestrat
This is my second home
 
ZT260 #243 (resting)

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Prestonpans
Posts: 22,462
Thanks: 650
Thanked 4,624 Times in 3,358 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ceedy View Post
I can make my CDTi auto's IPK to show btween 7-11 mpg on a fast getaway from a standing start

C.
I had a 3 litre V6 Omega Elite, I could get it into low single figures, by low I mean 3 mpg
__________________
Steve


T4 Location Map
stevestrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:04.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd