Go Back   The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums > Technical Help Forum
Register FAQ Image Gallery Members List Calendar
Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23rd May 2023, 21:18   #1
rrobson
I really should get out more.......
 
75 tourer cdti, MG ZS 180, nissan terrano & 1.8t rover 25

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pontefract
Posts: 2,644
Thanks: 17
Thanked 295 Times in 218 Posts
Default Diesel economy dropped, causes?

Before I get into the nitty gritty, I appreciate I’m moaning about something fairly trivial, of which many of you will likely not see as a problem to start with!

Anyway, my current 75 (a diesel tourer) had been absolutely exceptional on fuel over the last 20000 miles or so. But recently I have noticed it’s economy has dropped between 10-15%. On my current commute which is a round trip of 106 miles, it used to average at least 60mpg, normally around 62mpg. I haven’t done this commute for a while, but over the last two tanks with the same driving style it is struggling to do better than 55mpg. I used to do 260/270 miles at 1/4 of a tank mark, but it’s down to 230ish

There are a couple of things that have changed since, but I don’t believe them to be a huge contributor to the loss of economy. These include
-just passed 100000miles
-recently had the rear arms replaced
-not long since serviced

I suppose tracking could be out due to rear suspension refresh causing extra drag and scrubbing, but given I had a calliper binding last year and it still returned better economy I doubt it has a huge effect. It was quality parts for the service. Thermostat is opening correctly and it runs at 89 degrees. Drives as good as it did and doesnt feel any different.
It’s a little frustrating because it used to do 800 miles to a tank, now it’s more like 700. I’ve recently been doing lots of short journeys (for months now) so I understand it takes some time to “learn” but it would normally have sorted its self out by now. I also last week chucked a bottle of cleaner in and drove the 106 miles in third and fourth all the way to give it a good clear out. Feels perkier but hasn’t made much of a difference else where.
Thoughts??
__________________
How to view a car - everything you need to help you inspect a used car

VIS motor tester avalible to local members

Injector removal tool and auto gearbox pressure tester now available
rrobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2023, 06:16   #2
CivilSteve
Avid contributor
 
MG ZT

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Manchester
Posts: 237
Thanks: 20
Thanked 108 Times in 56 Posts
Default

These seem to be really picky about suspension components being touched and alignment being thrown out. So perhaps you're onto something there.

Sure any of the calipers are not binding? Even just a little bit

I had a front binding start of the year, then one of the rears got jammed up a short time after
CivilSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2023, 07:06   #3
rrobson
I really should get out more.......
 
75 tourer cdti, MG ZS 180, nissan terrano & 1.8t rover 25

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pontefract
Posts: 2,644
Thanks: 17
Thanked 295 Times in 218 Posts
Default

Definitely not binding, it’s had two new rears and a good used front on in the last 6 months, plus it rolls easy after a journey where before I didn’t need to use the handbrake when stopped…

Suspension may be contributing but I don’t think it would be enough to see the reduction I am getting. It really does need tracking though, but given the state of it underneath I doubt any of the fasteners would come loose anyway!

Fuel is the same, from the same filling station so I think it’s unlikely to be the issue. Maybe I’ll try a different petrol station?
__________________
How to view a car - everything you need to help you inspect a used car

VIS motor tester avalible to local members

Injector removal tool and auto gearbox pressure tester now available
rrobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2023, 08:19   #4
SD1too
Doesn't do things by halves
 
SD1too's Avatar
 
Rover 75 2.5 Connoisseur Auto (1999) Dealer launch model.

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Former Middlesex
Posts: 20,380
Thanks: 1,587
Thanked 3,749 Times in 3,181 Posts
Default

Hello Reece,

Fuel consumption is an emotive subject so it is with some hesitation that I'm replying to your appeal for thoughts. But I do have one which is worthy of consideration.

The crucial fact that is missing from your otherwise detailed account is how you are measuring your fuel consumption.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rrobson View Post
I used to do 260/270 miles at 1/4 of a tank mark ...
This seems to suggest that you're using the markings on the fuel gauge. If that is the case then it will give you a very approximate result indeed and no good at all for judging fuel consumption usefully.

The trip computer will also give variable readings depending upon when it is reset. These devices also typically become inactive below a certain road speed which adds to the inaccuracy. Your comment ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrobson View Post
... it takes some time to “learn” ...
... suggests that you are using this method.

The most reliable measurement is a brim-to-brim calculation made on as close to a full tank of diesel that you can manage. If you're not doing so already I'd recommend that you change to this method.

I doubt very much that the mileage, the new rear arms or the service have contributed to a perceived increase in fuel consumption. On the other hand ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrobson View Post
I’ve recently been doing lots of short journeys (for months now) ...
... frequent short journeys will definitely reduce mpg because fuel consumption is significantly higher during the warm-up phase as well as during stop-start journeys.

Simon
__________________
"Whatever is rightly done, however humble, is noble."
Sir Henry Royce.
SD1too is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2023, 09:19   #5
rrobson
I really should get out more.......
 
75 tourer cdti, MG ZS 180, nissan terrano & 1.8t rover 25

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pontefract
Posts: 2,644
Thanks: 17
Thanked 295 Times in 218 Posts
Default

Hi Simon, I always do a brim to brim calculation for fuel economy, that wasn’t the first indicator of low economy it was the fact that the usual mileage covered on the fuel gauge wasn’t achieved. A brim to brim confirmed the average was down by a good 7 or 8 but total miles covered was obviously lower before it needed filling

I appreciate the comments about using the fuel gauge as a marker (we all know what these are like) but over the years it has been very consistent when travelling longer distances. I have always been able to gauge economy by the mileage traveled at the markets on the tank. The only thing I use the trip computer for is the miles remaining. This tends to be fairly accurate believe it or not!

It’s unusually low so something isn’t happy. Injectors on their way out? Maf out of spec? Would probably benefit from a t4 just to investigate. Again, I know it’s fairly trivial for some as many probably aren’t managing 50mpg, let alone 60. The problem is driving this distance every day it’s the difference between 6 round trips on a tank or 7 round trips. Couple of weeks of that and it soon adds up!
The short journeys are a killer I know, but it normally reverts back to high economy very quickly, just not this time!! Which is leading me to think something isn’t working as it did.
__________________
How to view a car - everything you need to help you inspect a used car

VIS motor tester avalible to local members

Injector removal tool and auto gearbox pressure tester now available
rrobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2023, 11:11   #6
clf
This is my second home
 
clf's Avatar
 
MG ZT CDTi

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: carrick
Posts: 7,859
Thanks: 3,494
Thanked 2,657 Times in 1,973 Posts
Default

I fear your economy could be much worse, as brim.to.brim, as the weather warms up, should improve in the warmer weather.

Has the fuel used changed? Perhaps the station itself has changed supplier, or the brand changing the formula?

I used to get around 10-20 miles less per tank on the cheaper fuel, with a noticeable.improvement in performance on a branded fuel (which would explain the economy).

One of your fuel floats could be failing (sagging slightly) perhaps?

Using heating ventilation more frequently, or window open?

A seizing pulley on the serpentine belt?

A change of oil type (although I would think the fuel economy difference would be low single digits over a fill for this).

A blocked air filter or fuel filter? Remove the cover for air filter to make sure no debris is in its cradle to block the intake.

A failing maf could also have an.effect on the economy.

A soft tyre or imbalanced pressures?

sent from my iToilet Pro 3□
__________________


It is not gloss primer .............. it is duct tape silver!
clf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2023, 12:26   #7
rrobson
I really should get out more.......
 
75 tourer cdti, MG ZS 180, nissan terrano & 1.8t rover 25

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Pontefract
Posts: 2,644
Thanks: 17
Thanked 295 Times in 218 Posts
Default

Some great suggestions there, thank you.
Quite the opposite has been seen, some of the best economy I’ve got in previous years was when the temperature was in the 30’s.

That crossed my mind, but 100 miles a tank difference? Regularly used the same petrol station for about 5 years (an esso that was a texaco) so you’d expect it to have reasonable quality fuel.

Last time I filled I put 12 gallon in and the light was just about to come on so that’s pretty normal and tied up with the fuel gauge, so I’d like to say that’s behaving.

Cracking the passenger side windows on a long journey always had negligible effect on fuel usage, and I don’t use the air con because it doesn’t work

The belt is something I could look at, hadn’t thought about that. Doing 700 miles a week a seized pulley would identify itself sooner rather than later!

I changed the air filter during its last service a couple of months ago but it is another thing I can check.

Tyre pressures checked regularly as one has a very slow leak and needs topping up once a month so pressures are good.
__________________
How to view a car - everything you need to help you inspect a used car

VIS motor tester avalible to local members

Injector removal tool and auto gearbox pressure tester now available
rrobson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2023, 19:43   #8
clf
This is my second home
 
clf's Avatar
 
MG ZT CDTi

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: carrick
Posts: 7,859
Thanks: 3,494
Thanked 2,657 Times in 1,973 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rrobson View Post
Some great suggestions there, thank you.
Quite the opposite has been seen, some of the best economy I’ve got in previous years was when the temperature was in the 30’s.
that is what I meant. The economy should improve with better weather, but if yours is worse, it is maybe more of a problem than it is demonstrating.

Providing the driving is more or less identical between testing, you are right to be concerned. My own commute is month in month as close as identical with the odd run to the shops at the weekend. 10 miles each way, same route each time and I would get 420 miles per fill in winter, rising to 450 or 460 in summer. However, a couple of times per year, I would need to drive to Dublin, which would be about 120 miles from my house, and nearly all motorway or dual carriageway. When I have that drive, I will get between 480 and 500 miles to a fill depending on the temperature.

What is the operating temperature displaying on the OBD? My economy improved by around 10% when I finally sorted thermostat. However I also changed my fuel filter for the first time in my ownership, filling it with injector cleaner , running for half a minute, then leaving it to soak overnight.

Adding an inline thermostat would improve it each time - when I got the car it didnt go past 70 degrees , then with the first inline stat it wouldnt rise above 78, then 82, and finally with the current wahler it opens at 88/89, then settles at 86.

I know 10% seems extreme, however, if your coolant is only reaching 70 degrees, that along with perhaps another as yet undiagnosed issue could be contributing 70 miles of lost economy.

Another thought too, the clutch starting to slip slightly could have an effect. (try a higher gear, then accelerate as though in the gear below).
__________________


It is not gloss primer .............. it is duct tape silver!
clf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2023, 11:25   #9
EVS
Regular poster
 
Rover 75 1.8 Connoisseur SE

Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Flanders
Posts: 68
Thanks: 13
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default

After my fuel pump failed and was replaced, I noticed a great improvement on fuel economy. I went from about 28 mpg to 34 mpg.
EVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © 2006-2023, The Rover 75 & MG ZT Owners Club Ltd