Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryM1BYT
Not the same thing at all and not comparable. Would you equally welcoming of a leper, or someone with a similar disease into your home? Of course not and that would not be discrimination.
Would you expect free entry to a nightclub, because you are broke? What about a members only club, where you are not a member?
It is a matter of common sense and protecting oneself and those around you, nothing at all to do with discrimination against any religion, creed or colour of a person.
There are numerous places you cannot enter, because you do not qualify for entry - that is not any form of discrimination, you simply do not qualify. Qualify for entry and you can then get in.
Get the jab and you qualify, don't you don't get in - that simple.
|
You're missing the point, the jabs are personal choice and mandates are not the law, the way the government is getting around personal choice is restricting freedoms of the ones who haven't got jabbed. It is clear discrimination and in breach of sections of the human rights legislation that we are still a part of. If I choose not to be jabbed, that does not give anyone the right to discriminate against that choice, an unlawful mandate will just divide the people into groups as it is doing, the government want the jabbed to turn against those without to try to force compliance with what they want, they have turned people into idiots that believe the vaccines will make them immune, and that every non jabbed person is loaded with the virus. The risk to everyone is exactly the same now as a year ago, the vaccines have proved to be almost worthless.