|
||
|
|
20th October 2010, 13:51 | #1 |
Gets stuck in
MG ZTT+ 2.5 160 Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Devon ish
Posts: 743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I think you will have an issue getting number plates like these made as the legislation is very clear as to what you can display on a plate.
You could get around it by having "Show Plates" made but these wouldnt come with the BS number on them. Whether or no you would get picked up for it on a mot is another matter (can see the Police pulling you as long as the spacing / font is correct) |
20th October 2010, 14:50 | #2 |
Ex Owner
MX-5 ND2 RF Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leigh
Posts: 6,574
Thanks: 462
Thanked 799 Times in 524 Posts
|
Send an e-mail to Gill @ Designaplate with exactly what you want, nothing was too much trouble for them.
[email protected] |
20th October 2010, 19:40 | #3 | |
Regular poster
MG ZT 135+ Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bristol
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Do you think MOT testers are more vigilant for the BS number on post-2001 cars? They were obviously legal at some point because the press cars had them - the 'no logo' rule is very recent.
__________________
Proud owner of an MG ZT 135+ in Starlight Silver with Option Pack [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
|
20th October 2010, 20:04 | #4 | |
Gets stuck in
MG ZTT+ 2.5 160 Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: North Devon ish
Posts: 743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
But there are always some that are more efficient than others |
|
30th October 2010, 22:11 | #5 |
Regular poster
MG ZT 135+ Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bristol
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Gill has mocked up the plate for me. Can anyone clarify the following:
Click on the image below for a full size version:
__________________
Proud owner of an MG ZT 135+ in Starlight Silver with Option Pack [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Last edited by matthewsemple; 30th October 2010 at 22:16.. |
30th October 2010, 22:19 | #6 | |
This is my second home
Rover 75 Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: -
Posts: 5,895
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Quote:
The Rover logo should be the older style one, the MG badge is fine though. Under 'MG Rover Group' there should be the post code B31 2TB. This is the correct font I believe http://www.identifont.com/find?font=P22+Underground+Pro |
|
31st October 2010, 09:09 | #7 | |
Regular poster
MG ZT 190+ Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rotherham
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
However, this font is a fairly accurate representation for free.. http://www.fontspace.com/jonathan-paterson/london-tube |
|
31st October 2010, 11:49 | #8 |
Regular poster
MG ZT 135+ Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bristol
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi guys - thanks for supplying info on the fonts - those examples both look better. I think they have used Arial and then fiddled with the font size to get the title case look. If the proper font is used, MG Rover Group (i.e. title case) will translate into the correct sized lettering and the letters 'over' and 'roup' will be slightly smaller capitals.
The supplier won't put a postcode or BS number on them which is fair enough so in that respect they will be show plates. However with the correct UK79 lettering I don't envisage any issues with the MOT. Old plates in the boot won't work though - they will have a different registration because I am buying these plates because I am transferring a private plate I will get back to Gill and suggest that she uses the fonts provided above.
__________________
Proud owner of an MG ZT 135+ in Starlight Silver with Option Pack [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
|
18th December 2011, 19:31 | #9 |
Regular poster
Jaguar X-Type Estate Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Scottish Highlands
Posts: 97
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Correct?
Hi there, I noticed that everybody gets hung up on the style of the Rover logo, but it is the MG logo imho that is wrong. The original MG Rover logo had an MG logo that was full colour, like on the pylons, golden, with red lettering and border. The "replica" ones discussed here are all see-through, the yellow of the plates (or white for that matter) is coming through.
Even more so, I am wondering, the only reason for me to want MG Rover Group plates (and I would) is to bring my car somehow back to its origins, as it had orignally been registered by MGR for about a year. But then using private plates, cherished plates or whatever, N reg'd 75's which have only been introduced as S models, that kind of makes the pretend-original MGR logo look like a fake from the outset, or not? |
18th December 2011, 19:52 | #10 |
Banned
MG ZT V6 190+ Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 33,223
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,614 Times in 1,416 Posts
|
I think they are a close enough example of the original artwork used..which I have seen.
Members are using these plates as a nice way to bring up their number plates from obscure car dealers logos and damaged plates..At the price the seller has made these available,they make an attractive purchase. |
|
|