|
||
|
11th June 2015, 23:28 | #11 |
This is my second home
Rover75 and Mreg Corsa. Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sumweer onat mote o'dust (Sagin)
Posts: 21,754
Thanks: 341
Thanked 3,660 Times in 2,924 Posts
|
If you can guesstimate how high the centre of gravity is, you can determine how high you can lift it. I guess the height of the CG will be somewhere around the top of the engine, perhaps somewhat lower. Using a scale diagram of the car's front profile, you can get a pretty good idea of the angle needed to put the CG outside the wheelbase. I assume it's all theoretical anyway.There may be data on the CG height somewhere on t'Net.
TC |
12th June 2015, 06:38 | #12 |
Posted a thing or two
ROVER 75 Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canvey Island, Essex
Posts: 1,651
Thanks: 43
Thanked 163 Times in 134 Posts
|
I would be more worried about the weight of the car pushing down on the edge of the other tyres more than the car going over.
|
12th June 2015, 07:05 | #13 |
This is my second home
Rover 75 CDT-2001 Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wrexham, North Wales
Posts: 3,606
Thanks: 195
Thanked 606 Times in 501 Posts
|
How do you keep the car stable on this lift?
Are there supplementary supports to stop it toppling down if something shifts the balance point. Imagine the italian job bus, you take off a brake disk or something and the end of the car lifts up in to space. |
12th June 2015, 08:20 | #14 | |
This is my second home
75 Contemporary SE Mk II 2004 Man. Sal. CDTi 135ps, FBH on red diesel, WinCE6 DD Join Date: May 2010
Location: Leeds
Posts: 17,273
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 2,061 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
Quote:
Its not so finely balanced that taking wheels or other small parts, could have it move a noticeable distance. It feels very stable, even at maximum. My only concern is that of lifting a front wheel so high, that it over balances to roll over sideways. It feels a lot more stable and safer on this, than it ever did on axle stands. The base is many times bigger, than that of a stand and likewise the contact point with the car. Its here if anyone wants to try it, see what it can do and just how stable it feels. As said, they have/ had just one left at this price and it really is a great bargain. Machinemart are offering virtually the same model, at £2000 and its by far the cheapest/best on ebay and the only self powered one I could find on there.
__________________
Harry How To's and items I offer for free, or just to cover the cost of my expenses... http://www.the75andztclub.co.uk/foru...40#post1764540 Fix a poor handbrake; DIY ABS diagnostic unit; Loan of the spanner needed to change the CDT belts; free OBD diagnostics +MAF; Correct Bosch MAF cheap; DVB-T install in an ex-hi-line system; DD install with a HK amp; FBH servicing. I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money. |
|
12th June 2015, 09:06 | #15 | |
I really should get out more.......
Rover 75 1.8 Club Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Tilburg (Netherland)
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 572
Thanked 336 Times in 247 Posts
|
Quote:
But the general theory is correct I think. As soon as the centre of gravity goes over the centre of support area, it'll topple over. A meter should be easily done. Seeing as the car is about 1.50 or 1.60 meters wide, (and you believe that the centre of gravity is roughly around the centre) you would eventually draw a triangle. As soon as the bottom of the triangle reaches 0, it will have reach its maximum (going any further will push the CG over the point of contact with the ground). Knowing that the sloped side of the triangle will stay the same length (that distance doesn't change) we can start to calculate. The centre of width is roughly the centre of the width= 80 cm. The height of the CG is unknown, but I estimate around 50 cm high. The corner underneath the CG is 90 degrees when the car is flat. So we get: a= bottom: 80.00 b= sloped side: 94.34 c= height: 50.00 b won't change, but a will. So we just need to change a to 0 and make sure that the bottom corner stays at 90 degrees. c can never be higher then b, because then it wouldn't be the same triangle anymore. So the max for c is equal to b. So I would estimate that IF the CG is at roughly 50cm height, the maximum height to lift the car on one side would be 94.34 cm. If the CG would sit at 60 cm, that would make it 100cm. If the CG would sit at 70 cm, that would make it 106.30cm. Just a quick thought. There might be more to it...
__________________
Proud owner of the Dutch "Golden 75". A much loved Gold White Metallic Rover 75 1.8 na from 2000. |
|
12th June 2015, 09:15 | #16 |
This is my second home
75 Contemporary SE Mk II 2004 Man. Sal. CDTi 135ps, FBH on red diesel, WinCE6 DD Join Date: May 2010
Location: Leeds
Posts: 17,273
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 2,061 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
What immediately springs to mind, is that as it lifts under the tyre and suspension - the suspension will expand on the higher side as the weight comes off, on the low side it will be compressed. So the actual angle of lean will be quite a lot more, than calculated.
__________________
Harry How To's and items I offer for free, or just to cover the cost of my expenses... http://www.the75andztclub.co.uk/foru...40#post1764540 Fix a poor handbrake; DIY ABS diagnostic unit; Loan of the spanner needed to change the CDT belts; free OBD diagnostics +MAF; Correct Bosch MAF cheap; DVB-T install in an ex-hi-line system; DD install with a HK amp; FBH servicing. I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money. |
12th June 2015, 09:43 | #17 |
This is my second home
75 Tourer 2.5 Auto, 1.8T, 75V8ZT Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Johannesburg ZA
Posts: 6,200
Thanks: 1
Thanked 859 Times in 613 Posts
|
If you know the centre of gravity, then it is easy, as the load will tip when the centre of gravity overshoots the outer support.
I guess it will lean more than you think. But I would not work on it at that angle. |
12th June 2015, 09:53 | #18 | |
Posted a thing or two
rover75 cdt Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ALFORD lincolnshire
Posts: 1,216
Thanks: 107
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
12th June 2015, 12:43 | #19 | |
This is my second home
75 Contemporary SE Mk II 2004 Man. Sal. CDTi 135ps, FBH on red diesel, WinCE6 DD Join Date: May 2010
Location: Leeds
Posts: 17,273
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 2,061 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
Quote:
What I will be doing, is lifting one side, dropping it onto bits of rail sleepers, then lifting the other side.
__________________
Harry How To's and items I offer for free, or just to cover the cost of my expenses... http://www.the75andztclub.co.uk/foru...40#post1764540 Fix a poor handbrake; DIY ABS diagnostic unit; Loan of the spanner needed to change the CDT belts; free OBD diagnostics +MAF; Correct Bosch MAF cheap; DVB-T install in an ex-hi-line system; DD install with a HK amp; FBH servicing. I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money. |
|
12th June 2015, 12:43 | #20 |
Rodger & Out
Rover 75 Saloon Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: London
Posts: 712
Thanks: 10
Thanked 159 Times in 141 Posts
|
I certainly wouldn't lift one wheel up one metre. The stresses placed on the chassis and the loadings on the opposite wheels/suspension could lead to failure at a later date.
What effect it will have on an alloy wheel bearing the weight of a car on an angle is anyone's guess. I'd either lift the entire front or rear so weight of car remain fully across the tyre section on the other two wheels that remain on the ground. We used to use that type of vehicle lift for bendy-buses (six off) and was thinking of manufacturing a car set (four off) myself, either using the rams from engine hoists which are rated at 8 tons, which will give approximately 18" of lift, or using a cable/pulley system with electric motors and ratchet rack safety locking on upward travel. Rams are easier, but you have to run round manually pumping them and limited on travel, whereas electric can be any height and all controlled from one spot. Replacement hoist rams are £37 Last edited by RodgerD; 12th June 2015 at 12:49.. |
|
|