|
||
|
6th November 2010, 06:31 | #1 |
Loves to post
MG ZT+ CDTi Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: castle hedingham
Posts: 476
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
diesel consumption again............
chaps,
this is now frustrating me as i cannt work out if the car is running efficeintly so i would appreciate input. Now running around on short journeys i sort of accepted 27.9mpg average (ipk)..........but i went to cornwall and back. At the end of the down leg the computer upped its average to 31mpg. Now on the way back i did a brim to brim fill. Driving was approx 50miles faffin around cornwall and 365 miles home. On the way back i did hit traffic. Now a brim fill showed i had actaully averaged 38mpg yet my IPK showed 32.8mpg.......... i know the brim fill is the best way but would memebers still say my car is poor on consumption ?........i just need to know if i should be looking at doing something (i have ordered a tuning box) any ideas
__________________
Let Battle Commence |
6th November 2010, 06:44 | #2 | |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 Tourer Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,054
Thanks: 172
Thanked 48 Times in 42 Posts
|
Quote:
But what 'tuning box' have you ordered? A faulty MAF can cause fuel consumption issues but for resolving issues with them anything other than one of Rover Ron's Synergy boxes is dubious at best. And do a search for setting the trip computer, I recall there is a thread somewhere about how to adjust it so that you get a reading closer to your actual fuel consumption. Worth remembering the trip computer is just a computer - and 'garbage in equals garbage out'. There is no point in believing an instrument that is not error corrected. |
|
6th November 2010, 06:49 | #3 |
Loves to post
MG ZT+ CDTi Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: castle hedingham
Posts: 476
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
done
Hiya,
yep done all the filters....and all the basics. MAF appears to be working fine but i cleaned it anyway. I bypassed the EGR...... i just feel 38 is too low and its even worse when i faff around locally!
__________________
Let Battle Commence |
6th November 2010, 08:43 | #4 | |
This is my second home
75 Contemporary SE Mk II 2004 Man. Sal. CDTi 135ps, FBH on red diesel, WinCE6 DD Join Date: May 2010
Location: Leeds
Posts: 17,273
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 2,061 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
Quote:
Either way, your mpg figures are terrible compared to mine, so I can only repeat again what you seem to have already done. Your touring run should have produced nearer 50mpg if a manual. EGR, PCV, MAF - air filter and driving style. The Synergy (if that is what you meant) will not fix other issues, sort those out first - then you might see some small improvement with the Synergy.
__________________
Harry How To's and items I offer for free, or just to cover the cost of my expenses... http://www.the75andztclub.co.uk/foru...40#post1764540 Fix a poor handbrake; DIY ABS diagnostic unit; Loan of the spanner needed to change the CDT belts; free OBD diagnostics +MAF; Correct Bosch MAF cheap; DVB-T install in an ex-hi-line system; DD install with a HK amp; FBH servicing. I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me, send money. |
|
6th November 2010, 08:50 | #5 | |
Posted a thing or two
Rover 75 Tourer Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 1,054
Thanks: 172
Thanked 48 Times in 42 Posts
|
Recently?
Cleaned it and it made no difference? Could it have been faulty to start with? With what? Quote:
FWIW I have been getting an average of 43.6mpg - with a best of 50.5 and a worst of 36.1 - and yes I am dull enough to have kept a spreadsheet of my consumption for the past year. The consumption improved after I serviced it fully just after buying it. This dropped again in the cold in the winter but rose in the summer (I put this down to the thermostat not working - still not changed....) Note - the majority of this has been with the Synergy set to '10' and a Pierberg MAF - but I did not notice a significent change in fuel consumption with it. I presume because my MAF was in fact knackered when I got the car. As a whole the car goes much better now than when I bought it and it seemed to be OK. Also I know my fan is on the way out and so I don't use the air con much at all. |
|
6th November 2010, 09:40 | #6 |
Loves to post
MG ZT+ CDTi Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: castle hedingham
Posts: 476
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
filters
Hiya,
appreciate the advive. Yes filters done in last 1000miles....remind me about the PCV? i donnt reset every time ironically if i stand the car at Idle the heater blows coldish....when its running its as hot as i would expect?
__________________
Let Battle Commence |
6th November 2010, 10:02 | #7 | |
Gets stuck in
MG ZT+ 180 SE Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 646
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
PCV - small filter unit near the top of the rear of the engine, should really have been a service item on the diesels, has now been superceded by a fit-and-forget version from BMW. Surely if you don't reset every time, you're logically inevitably going to get a different figure from the brim calculation, because the IPK will be showing an average since it was last reset rather than a figure for the tank in question? Seems likely that your thermostat is suspect - a mildly faulty one will be preventing the engine getting up to optimum temperature and therefore hurting mpg.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
6th November 2010, 10:50 | #8 |
Banned
2004 75 Contemporary SE Tourer, 2005 (55) Pearl Black Conn. SE Tourer. Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 2,129
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
As a comparison, My dad's frontera (2.2 dti) would around town in traffic, go as low as 14MPG and up to 40MPG on a run.
The ZT's are a big car and around town you can't I don't think expect realistically any more than about 30MPG, even on a run, you're talking 48-50MPG unless you're at 60 in which case you may get more. Although not a small job - a thermostat would be something to look at getting done. Jake |
6th November 2010, 11:12 | #9 |
Passed Away
2002 Pale Blue. Rover 75 CDTi Connoisseur auto. 170K miles Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Near the M67.
Posts: 14,509
Thanks: 199
Thanked 585 Times in 397 Posts
|
Buying an MG = sports car?? and looking for economic motoring is a contradiction in terms innit?
You either have to drive your MG like a granny, which defeats the purpose of owning one, or get a smaller car.. A manual gearbox will give better mpg than an auto. Apart from that you will end up spending more money than you save by doing loads of modds to your car trying to improve the mpg.. I hear Mini's are nice? ... |
6th November 2010, 17:11 | #10 |
Avid contributor
MG ZT Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Galway
Posts: 194
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I've been keeping an eye on my mpg out of interest. I have been upgrading parts as per the recommendation on this forum and it has increased my mpg from about 40 to 45.
Since I got the car i've done the following: Replaced MAF with OEM Bosch part (got cheap from SMC Trading) - This increased the mpg in comparison with having the MAF unplugged (42ish to 45) but actually decreased it 0.5mpg from the duff one (negligible I know). I think this is probably due to my driving style when you actually have proper power under your right foot. I also cleaned the EGR and installed the new type PCV and also fitted new Viton O-Rings as the old ones were totally shot. These three updates/fixes seemed to raise the MPG from 40 to 45ish. I do about 50miles cruising at 60ish and 15-20 stop start urban driving a day so I'm happy with an overall figure of 45mpg. I do still have the thermostat to do as my car rarely gets above 70deg as per the OBD (think I'm gonna try the quick fix way outlined on here by Wuzerk for this). There seems to be varying reports as to whether this will increase the mpg or not but either way it can't be good for the engine to be running consistently 18-20deg below what it should.
__________________
MG ZT CDTi 135+ Trophy Blue 131,000 and rising |
|
|