|
||
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
I really should get out more.......
ZT 190+ Saloon Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Poole
Posts: 2,413
Thanks: 6
Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]() Time to vent some frustration on here!
There are two things, one frustrating and the other amusing. It's happened a few times now. I go into a shop and ask about a part or whatever and the bloke asks what kind of car do I have and I tell the honest truth, "Rover 75". "Oh nice! That's similar to a jag isn't it?" This is the part where I have to be polite but really want to tell him to **** off! It's not a Jag, if I wanted a Jag I would have bought a Jag. Anybody else get annoyed with the Jag issue? The other funny thing is the amount of people say "Hey, mate! You left your lights on."
__________________
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d1..._signature.png |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
This is my second home
Rover 75 CDT Connoisseur SE Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 12,227
Thanks: 469
Thanked 523 Times in 241 Posts
|
![]() It amuses me actually. There are far worse cars to be compared to.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Loves to post
Rover 75 1.8 Conn SE Auto (54) Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 269
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() My face lift 75 sometimes gets compared to a BMW, but what annoys me is if someone says it looks like a cross between a Jag and a BMW
![]()
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] N i c k |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avid contributor
2001 Rover 75 saloon 2.5 KV6 Conn SE Automatic Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 186
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() I assume from your comment that you have never been in, or driven an X type?? A Rover 75 is a FAR superior car to an X type!
We get the Jag comment here all the time. Mostly positive, in as much as they like our car, and compliment it, then say it is 'like a Jag'. At which point I tell them 'no it's much better than that' ! If somebody told me it looked like a BMW, I would probably have to be restrained! Andy ![]()
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
This is my second home
Rover 75 CDT Connoisseur SE Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 12,227
Thanks: 469
Thanked 523 Times in 241 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I've sat in an X type and the word litter springs to mind, after being in a 75, the quality and feel of it is worlds away from a 75, I had imagined I'd get an X type next but after being in one, no. I had actually had in my mind the old XJ6's and the likes when I wrote my comment. I also quite agree, I'd be most upset if someone said my British built and designed Rover bore any resemblance to a common BMW.
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Gets stuck in
Rover 75 Club 2.5 V6 Auto Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ipswich
Posts: 573
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The Jag issue don't really bother me and lets face it it could be far worst like being compared to a Lada or something **** like that, as for the lights do you have them on all the time or something??
__________________
Kind Regards Jason Player Woodbridge, Suffolk Money can't buy happiness. But it sure makes misery easier to live with. [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Rover 75 Club Auto K-Series 2.5 Litre Quad Cam 24 Valve in Steel Blue December 2000 Cowley build.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
I really should get out more.......
ZT 190+ Saloon Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Poole
Posts: 2,413
Thanks: 6
Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
I haven't thought about comparing the car in that possative way. I think it's the way people assume a jag is the preferred car and had to settle for a 75. I've heard the term 'poor mans jag' being used more often. I suppose at the end of the day it doesn't matter, I like my car. It just winds me up a bit.
__________________
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d1..._signature.png |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() 'I think it's the way people assume a jag is the preferred car and had to settle for a 75.'
There's nothing wrong with being a poor man. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Newbie
Rover 75 Tourer (2005MY) Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Knaresborough
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
I really should get out more.......
ZT 190+ Saloon Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Poole
Posts: 2,413
Thanks: 6
Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
|
![]() I think I've learnt a lesson from all the input on this thread.
A person comparing a car will compare it to one they are familiar with. I am a happy owner of a 75, therefore familiar with one, then I would compare a jag to a 75 rather than the opposite. I think cars such as 75's, Jag's, Bently's, ect, are rebirths of what are already classics. A classic design made contemporary in a rebirth, retaining the traditional car style but in a modern form. Newer mould breaking cars such as the new Civic, Smart car, frog-car (what ever it's called), they all boast a new break-beat design and are brave attempts to create a classic (as the mini did). A difference being some cars breaks the mould by new models (Smart car) and others by a new generation of an existing model (Civic). A new, previously unrealised model would be a gamble; the car could flop or prosper. Anyway, I’m starting to ramble. Rover managed to grab the best of both worlds!
__________________
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d1..._signature.png |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|