[marinabrian]

Originally Posted by SD1too

Oh dear, another diatribe of utter nonsense. I will have to put you right, yet again. Sigh.

I don't advise others to do anything Brian. I impart my experience and let others make up their own minds. I am not a dictator like you.

That's correct.

Your experience based upon a sample of one car Simon, mine is based upon many times that number, and I certainly don't dictate, I merely advise accordingly to the cumulative experience I've gained over the years

Ahh, you don't understand the philosophy. "Not doing things by halves" means repairing what is broken, no less and no more, to the highest standards. Your approach is blanket renewal at a high cost in both time and parts. That is not intelligent or cost effective

.

On the other hand doing half a job is false economy Simon

On the contrary, my braking system is absolutely perfect at a fraction of the cost in time and money of your practice.

Kunifer brake pipe is less than sixty pence per foot, how absolutely spendthrift to use an extra three feet !!

I don't have any "grotty ends" and my front pipes are in excellent condition due to my high standards of maintenance.

You must have the only Rover 75 not affected by use or age then Simon

It's called efficient maintenance in financial and engineering terms. Those who choose to follow my example will keep their cars running for longer at a fraction of the cost of your wasteful and unnecessary practices.

No Simon, it is called skimping on safety critical maintenance, and if your maintenance standards were that high, can I ask why you had to replace any of the fixed pipework on your car?

What you have found as every Rover 75 owner that doesn't have a car that resides at Gaydon, that steel pipework needs replacing from time to time, irrespective of the superiority their own maintenance regime


No one can accuse me of not being curious, yourself included Simon, as I bet even you are not this anal when it comes to checking for wear and tear, after renewing the front brake pipes on the ZT, I cut the corroded section from inside the wheel arch, a section which you advocate dressing up earlier on in this thread, and measured the wall thickness of the tube, and compared it to the other end of the same section of the pipe where it had been removed from the modulator.

The results were that of the original wall thickness of the tube had reduced by wastage to 70% of the original dimension, so less than 3/4,
Now while this may have provided a reasonably effective seal under normal braking conditions, what may have happened in an emergency braking scenario?

The problem being is simply, you cannot use NDT on brake pipes, and the last thing anyone wants is to hear of some unfortunate fellow member rear end another car when the pipework pops.

Now without exception, every single car I've encountered where it has been found necessary to replace the pipework where it is routed along the floorpan, the same pipe in section where it is routed along the rear chassis leg is similarly distressed, regardless of what you have to say on the matter.

So when you disagreed with dropping the tank was necessary when suggested by Andy, a job which in real life takes less than half an hour to complete in order to replace fully this pipework, you are showing yet again your disregard for others who may actually have a better grasp of the job in hand, based upon experience that includes more than your one sample vehicle.

Once again, you can read how to do a job many times in a book, you can theorise as much as you like, but experience is key, especially if you specialise in one type of vehicle.

Brian