Quote:
Originally Posted by trikey
I think this sums it up nicely...
|
If I'm not mistaken that, the top picture, is remarkably close to either child cruelty or abuse of a minor by the organisers of whoever produced it. It is tantamount to provocation by exposure to ridicule. There would also be a possibility of parental reckless endangerment.
The bottom half is no more than is regularly seen on various social media platforms. Nuff said about those bear pits. I wonder why nobody sees the need for a legal challenge - for the use of such publicity
and the ludicrous supposition theory behind it.