The 75 and ZT Owners Club Forums - View Single Post

CivilSteve · 1st November 2017, 08:55

I have, however I was a silly billy and overwrote the original results (dyno only holds 6 runs and I did a few sessions to tweak my mapping)

"Previous" - 134hp & about 215lbft (as I recall, tired MAF sensor doesn't help)

My tune (MAFless) - 149hp & 260lbft , torque limited as clutch was slipping under load but managed to get a strong top end so still rewarding to use full rev range.

Both done on same car , same dyno, same day. So about as fair as one can get.

Also going to say this , if you're happy with what you got that's perfectly fine. I'm not going to say you should change or that what you have is rubbish (apart from £5 ebay tunes they are rubbish!) This post is more to show other options for those who maybe are looking for a bit more or considering the options before picking a supplier

1st November 2017, 08:55	#7
CivilSteve Avid contributor MG ZT Join Date: Oct 2017 Location: Manchester Posts: 237 Thanks: 20 Thanked 108 Times in 56 Posts	I have, however I was a silly billy and overwrote the original results (dyno only holds 6 runs and I did a few sessions to tweak my mapping) "Previous" - 134hp & about 215lbft (as I recall, tired MAF sensor doesn't help) My tune (MAFless) - 149hp & 260lbft , torque limited as clutch was slipping under load but managed to get a strong top end so still rewarding to use full rev range. Both done on same car , same dyno, same day. So about as fair as one can get. Also going to say this , if you're happy with what you got that's perfectly fine. I'm not going to say you should change or that what you have is rubbish (apart from £5 ebay tunes they are rubbish!) This post is more to show other options for those who maybe are looking for a bit more or considering the options before picking a supplier Last edited by CivilSteve; 1st November 2017 at 09:04..