I've no idea why the banned member was banned. However, nor do I particularly want to know. I'm sure the directors are sensitive to trends and can be relied upon to accept at least some transgressions in the interests of the majority.
In defence of the 'banned member', and as far as I am aware, he never made snide allusions to other members' posts or interests.
Disparaging descriptions of other members' interests are somewhat more worthy of any banning that might go on surely? Such infantile behaviour in a well mannered club is a rather sad reflection.
__________________
member no. 235
|