Coronavirus theories
 

The more I hear and read about the coronavirus pandemic, the more I believe the virus wasn't a natural occurrence.

I've been reading about the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and how close this laboratory is to Wuhan's wet market.

How suspicious would it be to think that the source of the coronavirus outbreak was through accidental exposure by one of the Wuhan scientists?

The wet market could have been used as a cover up story. :shrug:

accidental?

Conspiracy, dangerous road to go down as conspiracy can become fact to some.

macafee2

It's said.
 

It's stated that this virus was patented by the Bill Gates foundation almost three years ago, in the genetic make up of the virus it's also said that there are four markers for HIV. It also makes no sense to state that we can't catch it from animals but yet it came from dead ones, how does that figure? The current anger of world Governments towards China tend to suggest there's much more going on behind the scenes. I was talking to a dental surgeon a good few weeks ago, he said that most medical professionals accept that it is a Bio Virus and has been tested as a weapon. The race to find a cure is as large as the Ebola one was, it has to be quick and the world knows it, the issue with a cure is that we need an Antidote, not a vaccine.

I am no longer surprised by how quickly- and with so little prior understanding of a highly technical subject, strong beliefs can be formed from information provided by anybody with an internet connection.
A little knowledge really is a dangerous thing in the right hands.

I don't think its anybody with an internet connection, the US are conducting a full-scale investigation into whether the deadly virus "escaped" from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

If intelligence analysts are on board, it's safe to say there is more to this virus than the current story that is being told.

I hope their not the same intelligence analysts that told us that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction ready to strike in 45 minutes :duh::shrug:

https://parrotwizard.com ;)

I heard this theory nearly a month ago. I'm surprised it's taken this long to 'come to light' :getmecoat:

It would make more sense if the source of the coronavirus outbreak was through accidental exposure from Wuhan's biolab.

The WIV is only a few miles from the wet markets, if the virus was accidentally exposed through someone being careless, a drop in safety standards, then a good cover up story is just a few miles up the road.

So just investigating a possibility makes the possibility a reality?

Really? Get a grip. It's equally valid for me to say that for want of something to do, and given the animosity between the USA and China being fostered by the US government. That it would be a given that the USA would seek to blame China for accidentaly or deliberately releasing a lab specimen - Even if such an investigation fails to find hard evidence the propaganda is still effective amongst the US population.



Quite. - But given as it certainly wasn't as simple and straightforward as the UK report actually saying that. But that was what a politician with power said it meant..... Since proven to be a whole load of bunk.