|
||
|
||
|
![]() |
#1 |
This is my second home
ZT400 Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ellesmere
Posts: 5,948
Thanks: 0
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]() I doubt these come up often so if you have a duff Lo-Line unit how about this
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=130048638417 It is probably not worth a light to the rest of us but I thought it would be worth mentioneing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
ROVER 75 2.5 V6 Connoisseur SE Limousine 2004 Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Welling
Posts: 10,995
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() I was at SMC looking at this one yesterday,
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Gets stuck in
75 Conn SE - X***VWY Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Reading
Posts: 564
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() So would it need all the GPS / navigation computer and other bits to make use of the lo-line bit?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
This is my second home
ZT400 Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ellesmere
Posts: 5,948
Thanks: 0
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]() I knew you would ask that
![]() I reckon Lo-Line is an easier install only one multi cable to run to the Navcomp from the dash no messing about with Radio, antenna TV tuners etc You would still need GPS aerial Nav comp and mounting bracket plus loom and a car with existing Hi-Line instruments ( I don't think there was different Lo-Line instrument cluster) Problem is these parts never come up on Ebay only Hi-Line stuff Personally if I was going to go to all that bother I would fit Hi-Line |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
I really should get out more.......
2003 Rover 75 Conn. SE Auto Tourer 131 ps CDTi Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2,512
Thanks: 38
Thanked 67 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Only downside I can see is the theft problem ![]()
__________________
Rover 75 CDTi SE Connoisseur Tourer (2003) In desirable STARLIGHT SILVER (now restored to it's former glory with all the chrome !) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|